<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/app.php/feed/topic/2465" />

	<title>Blue Iris</title>
	<subtitle>Blue Iris User Group</subtitle>
	<link href="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/index.php" />
	<updated>2021-10-22T09:25:11+00:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[Blue Iris]]></name></author>
	<id>https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/app.php/feed/topic/2465</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[TimG]]></name></author>
		<updated>2021-10-22T09:25:11+00:00</updated>

		<published>2021-10-22T09:25:11+00:00</published>
		<id>https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=10949#p10949</id>
		<link href="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=10949#p10949"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: singe core speed vs core count]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=10949#p10949"><![CDATA[
Nice one. Thanks for the info.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=178">TimG</a> — Fri Oct 22, 2021 9:25 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[mkw]]></name></author>
		<updated>2021-07-22T09:19:59+00:00</updated>

		<published>2021-07-22T09:19:59+00:00</published>
		<id>https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9768#p9768</id>
		<link href="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9768#p9768"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: singe core speed vs core count]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9768#p9768"><![CDATA[
Thank you very much for the link.  It gives some general idea what to expect.<br>I was thinking about this core speed issue and come up with very easy to perform test scenario - I am ashamed of myself I didn`t  think about it earlier ! What I did:<br>- I measured long enough average utilization of the CPU clocked at 4.1 GHz and it was between 68-70% on average. Depending on idle or triggered state.<br>- clocked exporting sample clip to mp4<br>- Downclocked CPU to 2.2 GHz and measured the same average utilization to be 70-73%<br>- exported the same clip <br>- checked overall responsiveness of the UI, logs for deepstack timings etc.<br>Observations - when running as a background service I don`t see any negative impact after reducing CPU frequency by almost half. While working with the UI I didn`t notice major impact. It is a little bit more sluggish, but it is not painful. With deepstack running on GPU I did not see any impact in average processing times  (some operations have to be CPU dependent). Reencoding took longer - this is probably done exclusively on CPU. <br>Conclusion - single core speed do not matter that much, with CPU`s with higher IPC than my ancient amd fx4100 I tested it on it will matter even less. I decided to go for low power consumption, low clock high core count Xeon.<br><br>Shared my experiment as maybe someone in the future will find it useful.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=4388">mkw</a> — Thu Jul 22, 2021 9:19 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Matts1984]]></name></author>
		<updated>2021-07-21T13:45:33+00:00</updated>

		<published>2021-07-21T13:45:33+00:00</published>
		<id>https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9759#p9759</id>
		<link href="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9759#p9759"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: singe core speed vs core count]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9759#p9759"><![CDATA[
I have not seen or am aware of a limit to the number of cores. AFAIK, the more the better and I'm already using quite a few - albeit on pretty old processors.<br><br>As for clock speed vs number of cores and which being better.... thats a hard call. This site has samples of real-world BI installs that you should be able to extrapolate what you're looking for.  <a href="https://biupdatehelper.hopto.org/default.html#stats" class="postlink">https://biupdatehelper.hopto.org/default.html#stats</a><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1988">Matts1984</a> — Wed Jul 21, 2021 1:45 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[mkw]]></name></author>
		<updated>2021-07-21T09:21:21+00:00</updated>

		<published>2021-07-21T09:21:21+00:00</published>
		<id>https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9756#p9756</id>
		<link href="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9756#p9756"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[singe core speed vs core count]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9756#p9756"><![CDATA[
Hello<br><br>I am new user of BI. It is running for about two months and I decided to migrate. Now when I started to move cameras over I reached max of crappy HW I have tested it on. I need to move to something more powerful.<br>I have 2011 v3 based server but it is quite power hungry beast with e5-2680 v3. I am thinking about swapping out just CPU to save $$ and go down with power consumption. I had in mind moving to low power e5-2608l v4 that is 8core 16 thread chip with 1.6 G base frequency.  <br>I have read through this forum but couldn`t really find an answer - how much cores/threads can BI utilize and how important single core speed is ?? I`d be really grateful for hints as testing this myself is about 2 days work - I have to migrate stuff that I have on this server right now just to see. <br><br>Regards, Mark<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://blueirissoftware.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=4388">mkw</a> — Wed Jul 21, 2021 9:21 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
