Page 2 of 2
Re: Reolink 4K vs Amcrest 4K
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2024 1:13 am
by Pogo
Brand war fishing expeditions are better suited to Facebook Groups..., or Google.
https://www.google.com/search?q=reolink ... e&ie=UTF-8
Good luck with your Blue Iris CPU issue.
Re: Reolink 4K vs Amcrest 4K
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 9:27 pm
by aubie8
JeffSparks wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 1:03 am
Got it. Thanks.
No one else wants to weigh in, either! lol
I would like to know from bi standpoint from people who use and not a random google search. I feel your pain. Or any other camera recommendations. Let me know if you find anything good please.
Re: Reolink 4K vs Amcrest 4K
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 10:59 pm
by GGW
I have been using Reolink for years, and have worked with other brands all the way to the true commercial cameras at a grand a pop. For the most part Reolink has worked well with no issues, If you can view it in a browser then you can see it in BI. It seems the new issue is for the new 6-8k video that uses H265 because H264 has an upper limit and BI currently does not support H265 natively. my question is will BI record the full 12meg video or is the recording limited to what can be seen.
Anyone else want to jump in?
G
Re: Reolink 4K vs Amcrest 4K
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2024 2:15 am
by Pogo
No.